Answering Your Most Common Employment Law Questions

Employment Law in Australia – What You Need to Know

Employment law in Australia is the primary mechanism used to protect employees against unfair treatment in the workplace, including discrimination, bullying, sexual harassment, unlawful dismissal, unfair dismissal, and an array of other potential harms.  To ensure that you are protected at work, it is essential to understand your rights and entitlements under the Australian employment law framework and to seek legal advice early.

For employers, it is important to be aware of their obligations under the Australian employment law framework to ensure they are compliant and to minimise legal risks.

In this article, we’ll be providing answers to some of your most common employment law questions.

What is the employment law framework?

Key employment law bodies in Australia include:

  • The Fair Work Commission (FWC);
  • The Fair Work Ombudsman; and
  • The Australian Human Rights Commission.

These bodies primarily utilise the statutory framework within the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) to investigate and/or determine employment-related issues.

What are my obligations and responsibilities as an employer?

Under section 44 of the FW Act, employers are expected to comply with the National Employment Standards. These are a set of minimum terms related to:

  • Maximum weekly working hours (s 62);
  • Requests for flexible working arrangements (s 65);
  • Parental leave and related entitlements (s 67);
  • Annual and other associated leave (s 86-113);
  • Public holidays (s 114);
  • Notices of termination/redundancy (s 117); and
  • Providing a fair work information statement (s 125).

Failure to abide by these standards could result in penalties for an employer.

Other obligations include the responsibility to keep compliant records regarding each employee for 7 years (s 535) and provide employees with payslips within one day of payment (s 536).

Unfair Dismissal – How do I know if my dismissal was unfair?

The rules regarding unfair dismissal will generally apply to employees who were employed for at least 6 months prior to their termination (or 12 months for small businesses with less than 15 employees).  To be eligible employees must be covered by a modern award or an enterprise agreement, or their annual income must be less than the high-income threshold.

Under section 385 of the FW Act, a dismissal will be unfair if the FWC can be satisfied that:

  • A dismissal has actually occurred;
  • The dismissal was harsh, unjust, or unreasonable;
  • The dismissal was not compliant with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code (if applicable); and
  • The dismissal was not a case of ‘genuine redundancy’.

A dismissal will be a case of ‘genuine redundancy’ if the employee’s job was no longer required due to a change in the employer’s operational requirement. However, a dismissal will not be a genuine redundancy where the dismissed employee could have been redeployed elsewhere within the organisation and/or the employer has failed to comply with a modern award or enterprise agreement to consult about the redundancy.

Employees can also be ‘constructively dismissed’ if they are forced to resign following oppressive acts by their employer (e.g., consistent late payments).

It is important to act quickly as there is a strict 21-day deadline from the date your dismissal took effect to lodge a claim.

How do I know if I am an independent contractor or an employee?

Although employees and independent contractors can often perform similar roles or duties, they are considered distinct categories of relationships with separate rights and obligations attached. Misclassifying employees as independent contractors can result in civil penalties.

Whether a worker is an independent contractor, or an employee will generally be assessed through the use of the ‘whole relationship test’. This test applies to any constitutionally covered business and will consider the real substance, practical reality, and true nature of the relationship (FW Act s 15AA).

In effect, this test requires an assessment of a work relationship to have regard not only to the actual term.

Employment matters affect both employees and employers. Contact our experienced employment lawyers for practical advice and strong representation to help resolve issues quickly and effectively.

Aggie Vlahos, Partner
[email protected] | 0405 995 057

Article co-authored by Kieran Bull, Paralegal at Elit Lawyers.

Share
Email
Print

Get in touch

With us personally, it is just one more way we’re different.

Danielle Snell

CO-FOUNDER AND MANAGING PARTNER

.

Aggie Vlahos

PARTNER

.

"

"Danielle guided us through the entire process with confidence and transparency, ensuring we always felt informed and supported."

Insurance Law

Plaintiff

We had an outstanding experience working with Danielle. From the very beginning, she demonstrated exceptional professionalism, clear communication, and a genuine understanding of our situation. She guided us through the entire process with confidence and transparency, ensuring we always felt informed and supported.

What truly stood out was her ability to achieve a fast resolution while securing the exact outcome we were hoping for. Her expertise and strategic approach made a stressful situation significantly easier to manage.

Equally impressive was Danielle’s compassion and friendliness. She took the time to listen, showed real empathy, and made us feel like more than just another case. We always felt valued and reassured

"

"Danielle kept me well-informed and involved, ensuring I was aware of all my options throughout the legal process"

Insurance Law

Plaintiff

Danielle Snell and the Elit Lawyers team acted for me on a high value insurance claim after insurers denied me all cover after my aircraft was damaged during the filming of a Hollywood movie. Given that insurers denied me all cover and offered to pay zero, with Danielle and team’s guidance, I issued proceedings in the Supreme Court of Victoria – Insurance List against the insurers involved. Danielle kept me well-informed and involved, ensuring I was aware of all my options throughout the legal process.

This was a stressful period for me, but I always felt confident and supported . I was happy to resolve the case prior to trial which involved a pay-out by the insurers. I felt confident to take on the insurers with the representation and support of Elit Lawyers and it proved to be the right move as I was ultimately paid out under my policy which was very different to the insurer’s original decision to pay me nothing.

"

"Within days, the podcast episode was removed and I was also given an apology, undertaking and some payment towards my legal costs"

Defamation – CEO

Plaintiff

I highly recommend Danielle and her team to anyone needing to fight defamation matters, they achieve results! I was defamed on a podcast which was published on various forums. The Elit team prepared detailed Concerns Notices to the original publisher and also to the podcast operator and other forums the podcast was published on.  Within days, the podcast episode was removed and I was also given an apology, undertaking and some payment towards my legal costs. Thank you to the Elit team for helping me with this personal matter.

– CEO 

"

"On advice from Danielle and Mark, I sued the insurer in the Federal Court Insurance List and a settlement was reached within a couple of months!"

Insurance Law

Plaintiff

One night, thieves broke into my home through the garage and stole my car whilst my wife and kids and myself were all in the house. They then abandoned and set the car on fire, resulting in a total loss. My insurance claim was denied because the car was parked in the driveway instead of the garage. On advice from Danielle and Mark, I sued the insurer in the Federal Court Insurance List and a settlement was reached within a couple of months!

"

"Aggie kept me well informed at every step and her supportive and approachable manner made a very stressful period in my life far easier to navigate."

Family Law – Property

Plaintiff

I’m very thankful that my financial planner referred me to Aggie Vlahos. She guided me through negotiating, documenting and completing my family law property settlement with my ex. Aggie kept me well informed at every step and her supportive and approachable manner made a very stressful period in my life far easier to navigate. Would absolutely recommend.

 

"

"I was grateful for Aggie’s expert advice, patience, and support during my family law court case"

Family Law

Plaintiff

Aggie acted for me in relation to my litigated family law matter – during an intense and difficult time in my life.  I was grateful for Aggie’s expert advice, patience, and support during my family law court case which we were able to resolve positively at mediation. I would strongly recommend Aggie and her team to anybody needing legal assistance with their family law matter.

 

Can't find what you're looking for?

Search